AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Nfl implied team totals1/14/2024 Most common stack with no runback (positions connected with “-” indicate the stack, the position after the “/” indicates the runback): Much of what I’m going over here are things I kept track of on a weekly basis last season.īefore we dive in, keep in mind that part of recognizing trends is recognizing when a smoke screen is disguised as a trend, with a couple of examples of that coming to fruition here. Here, I’m looking at the winning Milly Maker lineups in the main slate, that had a $20 buy-in, in 2021, weeks 1 to 17 (I prefer not to use the final week of regular seasons due to their potential for weird outcomes). But as you go down the highest scoring lineups, you’ll quickly find that the gap between lineup scores becomes minimal, and even include duplicate lineups and duplicate scores.Ĭomplement that analysis by looking solely at the Josh Allens, Derrick Henrys, and Cooper Kupps of Milly Maker contests, and you will be looking at hints and trends to give you insight into what separates the top lineup from the rest. It’s also the same between the WR7 and the WR27.Īnalysis of the weekly top 100 DraftKings Millionaire Maker lineups is very valuable. That same gap is present between the QB2 and QB5, and also between the QB6 and QB11.ĭerrick Henry‘s 2.2 half-PPR points-per-game gap is the same gap that is present between the RB4 and RB11.Ĭooper Kupp‘s 2.8 points-per-game gap is the same that is present between the WR3 and WR6. In 2021, Josh Allen was QB1 in points-per-game, scoring 1.28 more than the QB2. Part 1 reviews what kind of information we can harness from those lineups, before devising a strategy for 150-lineup, max entry contests in Part 2. If you followed along with my weekly DraftKings Milly Maker winning lineup analysis last year, you’ve already seen a lot of the talking points I’ll hit here.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |